On 12/28/11 5:57 PM, Philip wrote:
> So without job control bash might (I know, we don't know for sure)
> send the SIGHUP to all processes started in the shell, whether child
> by definition or not?
No, it doesn't.
> Shouldn't the -i flag enable job control by the way?
Yes, and it does. The pr
On 12/28/11 4:42 AM, Stas Sergeev wrote:
>>> But, -i sets "interactive_shell" variable, not "interactive", so the
>>> aforementioned comment and code makes no sense, though it
>>> might have been working in the past.
>> `-i' sets the `forced_interactive' variable; look at flags.c. The shell
>> se
