Bash-4.2 patches 9 and 10

2011-05-13 Thread Joachim Schmitz
Hi folks Just found Bash-4.2 patches 9 and 10, strange that they never got announced? --- Bye, Jojo

Re: Bash-4.2 patches 9 and 10

2011-05-13 Thread Eric Blake
On 05/13/2011 04:54 AM, Joachim Schmitz wrote: > Hi folks > > Just found Bash-4.2 patches 9 and 10, strange that they never got > announced? Yes they did: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/2011-05/msg00014.html http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/2011-05/msg00015.html Along with

RE: Bash-4.2 patches 9 and 10

2011-05-13 Thread Joachim Schmitz
Eric Blake wrote: >On 05/13/2011 04:54 AM, Joachim Schmitz wrote: >> Hi folks >> >> Just found Bash-4.2 patches 9 and 10, strange that they never got >> announced? > >Yes they did: > >http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/2011-05/msg00014.html >http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/2011

Re: Bash-4.2 patches 9 and 10

2011-05-13 Thread Allan McRae
On 13/05/11 21:44, Eric Blake wrote: On 05/13/2011 04:54 AM, Joachim Schmitz wrote: Hi folks Just found Bash-4.2 patches 9 and 10, strange that they never got announced? Yes they did: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/2011-05/msg00014.html http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/

Re: Bash-4.2 patches 9 and 10

2011-05-13 Thread Andreas Schwab
Eric Blake writes: > Along with an accidental announcement for a missing patch 11: > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/2011-05/msg00028.html It's not missing, that's a 4.1 patch. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3

Re: Bash-4.2 patches 9 and 10

2011-05-13 Thread Andreas Schwab
"Joachim Schmitz" writes: > Or did something break in forwarding mails to bug-bash to the news group? Probably during the mail server move, gnu.emacs.help broke as well. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5

Feature Request - Allow mapfile to handle NUL-delimited data

2011-05-13 Thread DJ Mills
A -0 option, or even an option to use a different field separator, would be an excellent feature for mapfile. Currently, of course, you can use: while IFS= read -rd '' file; do array+=("$file"); done mapfile is considerably faster, however, and I think this would be quite handy.