On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 07:47:12AM -0430, Andres Perera wrote:
> unquoted assignments should not apply IFS to $@
BTW, out of plain curiosity http://www.in-ulm.de/~mascheck/various/ifs/
lists some existing implementations.
> This is normal. Readline is trying to read input.
May be normal, but then please explain why Bash 4.1 patchlevel 009 works
and Bash 4.2 patchlevel 6 don't. If I downgrade the virtual container it
works again. So the only change is Bash and until proven otherwise that
is in my humble opinion the
On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 08:59:30AM +0100, Henk van de Kamer wrote:
> > That says nothing about what the child process does.
>
> Correct, but that is as far as I get with my knowledge :-).
Please enlighten yourself as on how to trace child processes,
by reading strace(1) manual page.
--
ldv
p
Hello!
I just had discover (on my back) ulimit command bug.
There is "resident set" limit, which is set in PAGES. But ulimit
command shows it as kBytes. On by system page size size is 4Kb, so
difference is four times...
Simple test (using raw getrlimit call) shows, that ulimit sets and
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 05, 2011 at 03:36:39PM +0300, Sergey Zhumatiy wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I just had discover (on my back) ulimit command bug.
> There is "resident set" limit, which is set in PAGES. But ulimit
> command shows it as kBytes. On by system page size size is 4Kb, so
> difference is fo
On 3/5/11 2:36 PM, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Mar 05, 2011 at 03:36:39PM +0300, Sergey Zhumatiy wrote:
>> Hello!
>>
>> I just had discover (on my back) ulimit command bug.
>> There is "resident set" limit, which is set in PAGES. But ulimit
>> command shows it as kBytes. On by
On 3/5/11 9:50 AM, Henk van de Kamer wrote:
>> This is normal. Readline is trying to read input.
>
> May be normal, but then please explain why Bash 4.1 patchlevel 009 works
> and Bash 4.2 patchlevel 6 don't. If I downgrade the virtual container it
> works again. So the only change is Bash and un
