Greg Wooledge wrote:
I prefer plan C: leave it alone. It's working fine.
Your preference could be used as an excuse to stop
all future growth in primitive interfaces, however 'fine'
is in the eye of the beholder. If everything was fine with
the shell, we'd all be using borne she
OK, my magic error corrector chose this as its output:
bash -c 'cd foobar' && ci filename
Is that what you were hoping for?
There's a big difference between a compiler and an interpreter. The
former can afford to take the time to do some of the kinds of things
that you describe. Those same thin
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 3:20 AM, Linda Walsh wrote:
>
>
> So far, no one has come up with any good reasons why this would be a
> problem, or how it would create any compatibility problems. All I've
> seen is an attitude of 'well, I don't wanna! It's my toy and I didn't
> think of the idea, and
