Re: bash32-019 can't be applied

Hello, Na Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 01:47:43PM -0400, Chet Ramey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pisal(a): > > after applying bash32-001..bash-018 patches, i can't apply bash32-019. > > is this expected? > > Nope. I just applied patches 1-25 to a freshly-unpacked copy of bash-3.2 > without any failures. okay,

Re: Numbering of items during completion

Gerrit Sangel wrote: > Hello list, > > I have several files with unicode characters in the file names. But I am > using > a German keymap, which only has a limited amount of characters mapped to it. > > The problem now is, if I want to change into a directory or open a file which > has, say, a

Bash-3.2 Official Patch 18

BASH PATCH REPORT = Bash-Release: 3.2 Patch-ID: bash32-018 Bug-Reported-by:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug-Reference-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Bug-Reference-URL: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/2007-05/ms

Bash-3.2 Official Patch 19

BASH PATCH REPORT = Bash-Release: 3.2 Patch-ID: bash32-019 Bug-Reported-by:Thomas Loeber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Bug-Reference-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Bug-Reference-URL: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug

Bash-3.2 Official Patch 20

BASH PATCH REPORT = Bash-Release: 3.2 Patch-ID: bash32-020 Bug-Reported-by:Ian A Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Bug-Reference-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Bug-Reference-URL: Bug-Description: In some cases of error pr

Bash-3.2 Official Patch 21

BASH PATCH REPORT = Bash-Release: 3.2 Patch-ID: bash32-021 Bug-Reported-by:BAGSHAW Paul RD-TECH-REN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Bug-Reference-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Bug-Reference-URL: http://lists.gnu.org/archi

Bash-3.2 Official Patch 23

BASH PATCH REPORT = Bash-Release: 3.2 Patch-ID: bash32-023 Bug-Reported-by:Chet Ramey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Bug-Reference-ID: Bug-Reference-URL: Bug-Description: When an error occurs during the pattern removal word

Bash-3.2 Official Patch 24

BASH PATCH REPORT = Bash-Release: 3.2 Patch-ID: bash32-024 Bug-Reported-by:Peter Volkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Bug-Reference-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Bug-Reference-URL: http://bugs.gentoo.org/177095 Bug-Desc

Readline-5.2 Official Patch 6

READLINE PATCH REPORT = Readline-Release: 5.2 Patch-ID: readline52-006 Bug-Reported-by:Peter Volkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Bug-Reference-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Bug-Reference-URL: http://bugs.gentoo.org/1770

Readline-5.2 Official Patch 7

READLINE PATCH REPORT = Readline-Release: 5.2 Patch-ID: readline52-007 Bug-Reported-by:Tom Bjorkholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Bug-Reference-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Bug-Reference-URL: http://lists.gnu.org/arch

Readline-5.2 Official Patch 5

READLINE PATCH REPORT = Readline-Release: 5.2 Patch-ID: readline52-005 Bug-Reported-by:Thomas Loeber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Bug-Reference-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Bug-Reference-URL: http://lists.gnu.org/arch

Bash-3.2 Official Patch 22

BASH PATCH REPORT = Bash-Release: 3.2 Patch-ID: bash32-022 Bug-Reported-by:Chet Ramey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Bug-Reference-ID: Bug-Reference-URL: Bug-Description: POSIX specifies that the `read' builtin invoked from

Re: Readline-5.2 Official Patch 7

On Friday 24 August 2007, Chet Ramey wrote: > READLINE PATCH REPORT > = > > Readline-Release: 5.2 > Patch-ID: readline52-007 is this one going to be released as a bash patch as well ? i see readline patches 5/6 match a bash pa

Re: Readline-5.2 Official Patch 7

On Friday 24 August 2007, Eric Blake wrote: > According to Mike Frysinger on 8/24/2007 3:03 PM: > >> Readline-Release: 5.2 > >> Patch-ID: readline52-007 > > > > is this one going to be released as a bash patch as well ? i see > > readline patches 5/6 match a bash patch, but not this one ... > > ba

Re: Readline-5.2 Official Patch 7

Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Friday 24 August 2007, Chet Ramey wrote: >> READLINE PATCH REPORT >> = >> >> Readline-Release: 5.2 >> Patch-ID: readline52-007 > > is this one going to be released as a bash patch as well ? i see readli

Re: Readline-5.2 Official Patch 7

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Mike Frysinger on 8/24/2007 3:03 PM: >> Readline-Release: 5.2 >> Patch-ID: readline52-007 > > is this one going to be released as a bash patch as well ? i see readline > patches 5/6 match a bash patch, but not this one ... bash32-025 h

Bash-3.2 Official Patch 25

BASH PATCH REPORT = Bash-Release: 3.2 Patch-ID: bash32-025 Bug-Reported-by:Tom Bjorkholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Bug-Reference-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Bug-Reference-URL: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug