Jan Schampera wrote:
> I intentionally expected <() and >() to be as protected as $() is. Is
> there a specific reason for them to not be protected against the
> initial parsing?
Those sequences are not treated specially, but it's a reasonable
suggestion for a future enhancement.
Chet
--
``Th
Roland Eggner wrote:
> $ bash --version
> GNU bash, version 3.1.17(1)-release (i486-pc-linux-gnu)
>
> Description:
> FEATURE REQUEST:
> when storing history, skip failed commands depending on exit status,
> controlled by a third option "ignorefailed" added to HISTCONTROL
Commands are
