Re: bash 3.1 on Solaris 9

2006-07-18 Thread Bob Proulx
Chris, Please keep replies to the mailing list so that others may participate and the answers will be available for those who search the archives later. Also I am actually traveling right now and so I will be really slow responding for a while. Cheltenham, Christopher J wrote: > Well I tried to

Re: bash 3.1 on Solaris 9

2006-07-18 Thread Hugh Sasse
On Tue, 18 Jul 2006, Bob Proulx wrote: > Chris, [...] > > The third part is Sun Freeware which I always thought was you guys > > anyway but apparently not. > > I am not familiar with Sun Freeware. Others on the mailing list might http://sunfreeware.com/ > I will infer, perhaps incorrec

message: ^Z: nothing to suspend

2006-07-18 Thread Dan Jacobson
Maybe bash should print a message when one hits ^Z but there is nothing to suspend: $ bla& ^Z bash: useless hit of ^Z or bash: ^Z: nothing to suspend ___ Bug-bash mailing list Bug-bash@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-bash

mention kill 0

2006-07-18 Thread Dan Jacobson
The kill(1) man page doesn't mention "kill 0". /bin/kill 0 #scripts proceed no further The bash man page mentions kill 0, but not in its main kill paragraph. The bash man page doesn't mention kill -1. The bash "help kill" bulrb doesn't mention kill 0 or -1. The kill(1) man page, as of procps: Ins