Uname:
Darwin mac.bandsman.co.uk 5.5 Darwin Kernel Version 5.5: Thu May 30 14:51:26
PDT 2002; root:xnu/xnu-201.42.3.obj~1/RELEASE_PPC Power Macintosh powerpc
CC: 2.95.2
./configure worked fine.
Make gives:
...
rm -f libreadline.5.1.dylib
cc -dynamic -arch_only `/usr/bin/arch` -install_name
/u
Greetings
Attached is a little hack which allows you to define an alternative to
~/.bashrc by setting the BASHRC environment variable.
This was useful to me since I am unable to modify ~/.bashrc on a customer site
to my taste without incurring the wrath of other folks using the same user
log
> > (1) yank 0th arg, similar to yank-last-arg, but copies the
> command part
> > of the previous line
> > into the current buffer. Example: The previous line was
> >
> > /usr/local/bin/perl myprog.pl
> >
> > then yank-0th-arg should insert /usr/local/bin/perl into the buffer.
>
> M-0 M-. (digi
not sure if this is a bug or feature ... take this little snippet:
testit() {
local foo=$(false) ; echo $?
foo=$(false) ; echo $?
}
when we run the code, the output is:
0
1
rather than intuitive:
1
1
-mike
___
Bug-bash mailing list
Bug
Nigel Horne wrote:
> Nigel Horne wrote:
>>> Since compilation failed bashbug hasn't been installed, so I am having
>>> to
>>> guess what is wanted. Let me know if you need any more help.
>> Does isinf appear in libc on AIX 5.1? How about isnan?
>
> There are man pages for both isinf and isnan, bu
Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
Note: As far as I can tell the echo tests in the configure script
generated by autoconf-2.59 tests for quite many things but not \digit as
far as I can tell. I have not yet looked into the CVS version.
Regards
Henrik
---
Sorry, haven't been involved too much on t
Hello everybody,
* Linda W wrote on Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 10:16:44PM CET:
> Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> >Note: As far as I can tell the echo tests in the configure script
> >generated by autoconf-2.59 tests for quite many things but not \digit as
> >far as I can tell. I have not yet looked into the C
"Com MN PG P E B Consultant 3" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Wenn you now do echo $e, you should get the following output:
Try echo "$e". Then read about Word Splitting in the Bash manual.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 9040
Andreas Schwab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> There's a little history here. POSIX 1003.2-1992 said that echo has
>> implementation-defined behavior if given any options, or if any
>
> Are you sure about "any option"? The current spec only talks about -n.
Yes, I have the printed copy of POSIX 1
Hi again,
I've done some more testing -- but still I don't get the whole figure.
here are some more mosaic pieces for the jigsaw puzzle, maybe you know
what's going wrong here ?!
I've done some more compile tests mostly on HP-UX 11.11 (and 11.22).
my default build (which is broken) was with gcc
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> not sure if this is a bug or feature ... take this little snippet:
> testit() {
> local foo=$(false) ; echo $?
> foo=$(false) ; echo $?
> }
>
> when we run the code, the output is:
> 0
> 1
>
> rather than intuitive:
> 1
> 1
It's intentional.
`local' returns s
Nigel Horne wrote:
> Uname:
> Darwin mac.bandsman.co.uk 5.5 Darwin Kernel Version 5.5: Thu May 30 14:51:26
> PDT 2002; root:xnu/xnu-201.42.3.obj~1/RELEASE_PPC Power Macintosh powerpc
> CC: 2.95.2
>
> ./configure worked fine.
Apple moved some things around in 10.2. In 10.2 and later, you need t
Hi folks,
I wonder if there is a thorough documentation on line numbering in
bash's error messages?
I find it often quite misleading and would like to know what I am
counting wrong.
Any hint or help is appreciated.
Dirk
___
Bug-bash mailing lis
13 matches
Mail list logo
