Re: bash-3.1 build feedback

2005-12-14 Thread Chet Ramey
Mike Frysinger wrote: > this is the same thing as cross-compiling which doesnt work correctly > when it comes to generating the signal lists ... the binutils you are > using is older which is why binutils segfaulted ... it should be fixed > in newer versions to error out gracely when attempting to

Re: let expression parsing broken in bash 3.1

2005-12-14 Thread Chet Ramey
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 10:00:52PM -0500, George Sherwood wrote: > > Description: > > Let expression parsing appears to be broken in bash 3.1. When > > using a simple expression such as let a=(5+3) I get this error: > > bash: syntax error near unexpected token `(' > > seems to be most a

Re: bash-3.1 build feedback

2005-12-14 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 08:40:30AM -0500, Chet Ramey wrote: > Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > this is the same thing as cross-compiling which doesnt work correctly > > when it comes to generating the signal lists ... the binutils you are > > using is older which is why binutils segfaulted ... it shoul

help should check 2nd ... args

2005-12-14 Thread Dan Jacobson
$ help : ! :: : No effect; the command does nothing. A zero exit code is returned. What about that second argument? $ help ! bash: help: no help topics match `!'. Try `help help' or `man -k !' or `info !'. Regarding RESERVED WORDS $ set ! case do done elif else esac fi for function \ if

Re: bash-3.1 build feedback

2005-12-14 Thread Chet Ramey
Nelson H. F. Beebe wrote: > > Machinetype:Intel Pentium III (600 MHz);NetBSD 1.6 (GENERIC) > Remote gcc version: gcc (GCC) 3.4.3 > Remote g++ version: g++ (GCC) 3.4.3 > Configure environment: CC=gcc C