On 3/21/23 3:53 PM, Grisha Levit wrote:
So to wait for a procsub after receiving a terminating signal, one
must do so in a trap for the signal itself and not in an EXIT trap.
Yes, that would probably work.
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
``Ars l
On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 3:28 PM Chet Ramey wrote:
>
> > Interestingly, if an external command or a subshell is executed after
> > the process substitution is started but prior to receipt of the
> > signal, the `wait' works fine:
> >
> > $ (trap 'wait $!; echo $?' EXIT; : <(:); (:); kill 0)
>
> Bec
On 3/19/23 11:10 PM, Grisha Levit wrote:
If an EXIT trap is executed after receipt of a terminating signal,
waiting on a process substitution within the trap can fail:
The terminating signal handler cleans up FIFOs and any running procsubs
before running the exit trap, which is the last thing i
If an EXIT trap is executed after receipt of a terminating signal,
waiting on a process substitution within the trap can fail:
$ (trap 'wait $!; echo $?' EXIT; : <(:); kill 0)
-bash: wait: pid 83694 is not a child of this shell
127
Interestingly, if an external command or a subshell is executed a
