On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 10:54:45PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
> > Bash (really readline) will redraw the current command line using the
> > new dimensions if you resize while the line is being edited. Everything
> > else is out of its hands and up to the terminal emulator.
>
> Thanks f
> > Bash (really readline) will redraw the current command line using the
> > new dimensions if you resize while the line is being edited. Everything
> > else is out of its hands and up to the terminal emulator.
>
> Thanks for the explanation.
> How can I solve the problem from the terminal side
On 22 Feb 2005, Chet Ramey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Just to be sure: I meant that the old information in the xterm window is
> > not extended by the characters that should be visible again after increasing
> > the window size.
>
> What do you mean by `the information in the window'?
All th
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I make an xterm window running bash smaller and then larger again,
the information in the window doesn't get restored (only
the information visible in the smaller size is visible after
making the xterm larger).
...
On 22 Feb 2005, Chet Ramey wrote:
Please read item E11 i
> > If I make an xterm window running bash smaller and then larger again,
> > the information in the window doesn't get restored (only
> > the information visible in the smaller size is visible after
> > making the xterm larger).
...
On 22 Feb 2005, Chet Ramey wrote:
> Please read item E11 in the B
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all.
If I make an xterm window running bash smaller and then larger again,
the information in the window doesn't get restored (only
the information visible in the smaller size is visible after
making the xterm larger).
I could use the screen command for this, but is ther
Hi all.
If I make an xterm window running bash smaller and then larger again,
the information in the window doesn't get restored (only
the information visible in the smaller size is visible after
making the xterm larger).
I could use the screen command for this, but is there an easier solution?
