Daniel Lublin writes:
> Apparently the patch needed to fix this was the one Florian Weimer
> posted in november 2023, in "C compatibility issue in the configure
> script" <8734oqnlou@gentoo.org> (if you don't have the mail history:
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/2023-11/msg0010
The message ID with the patch in question was of course
<87leasmvoo@oldenburg.str.redhat.com>
--
Daniel
lublin.se
Apparently the patch needed to fix this was the one Florian Weimer
posted in november 2023, in "C compatibility issue in the configure
script" <8734oqnlou@gentoo.org> (if you don't have the mail history:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/2023-11/msg00104.html)
Maybe some compiler cha
szige...@delg0.elte.hu writes:
> Configuration Information [Automatically generated, do not change]:
> Machine: x86_64
> OS: linux-gnu
> Compiler: gcc
> Compilation CFLAGS: -march=x86-64 -mtune=generic -O2 -pipe -fno-plt
> -fexceptions -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -Wformat -Werror=format-security
> -fs
On Wed, Jul 03, 2024 at 22:24:43 +0200, szige...@delg0.elte.hu wrote:
> Description:
> printf works in version 5.2.026-2, fails in version 5.2.026-3
What exactly are these version numbers? Are they packages from some
Linux distrbution?
> Repeat-By:
> contents of tmp.sh begins ---
Configuration Information [Automatically generated, do not change]:
Machine: x86_64
OS: linux-gnu
Compiler: gcc
Compilation CFLAGS: -march=x86-64 -mtune=generic -O2 -pipe -fno-plt
-fexceptions -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -Wformat -Werror=format-security
-fstack-clash-protection -fcf-p
