On 1/12/24 1:06 PM, Oğuz wrote:
Why would that be unexpected, since you're explicitly running something
in the calling shell's context, with the expected side effects to that
environment?
I wasn't clear. This doesn't exit the shell
bash-5.3$ exec foo
bash: exec: foo: not found
On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 7:05 PM Chet Ramey wrote:
> Nofork command substitution freezes the jobs list, because you don't
> want jobs appearing and disappearing in the list while you're running
> word expansion. If the jobs list is frozen, wait -n doesn't even try
> waiting, since you don't want jo
On 1/4/24 8:36 AM, Oğuz wrote:
These bugs affect the development branch only.
1. `wait -n' doesn't work inside nofork command substitution. I think
it should, or wait without `-n' shouldn't work either, or what works
and what doesn't should be documented.
Nofork command substitution freezes th
These bugs affect the development branch only.
1. `wait -n' doesn't work inside nofork command substitution. I think
it should, or wait without `-n' shouldn't work either, or what works
and what doesn't should be documented.
$ sleep 3 & sleep 1; echo ${| wait -n -p REPLY;}
[1] 433
$
