> > That code is quite different in bash-3.2, and the memory leak is gone.
>
> Definitely neither.
Oh, there's no question there's a leak. It just doesn't appear to have
any consequences on my systems. It will get fixed.
Chet
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
Chet Ramey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> That code is quite different in bash-3.2, and the memory leak is gone.
Definitely neither.
---
builtins/read.def |9 ++---
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Index: builtins/read.def
=
Chet Ramey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Chet Ramey wrote:
>> Andreas Schwab wrote:
>>
>>> I can still reproduce it with 3.2.25, where the code is identical.
>>
>> Really? I let the loop run for 45 minutes last night before killing it,
>> without a memory allocation error. I'll check again.
>
Chet Ramey wrote:
> Andreas Schwab wrote:
>
>> I can still reproduce it with 3.2.25, where the code is identical.
>
> Really? I let the loop run for 45 minutes last night before killing it,
> without a memory allocation error. I'll check again.
And today it ran for more than an hour. I'm not
Andreas Schwab wrote:
> I can still reproduce it with 3.2.25, where the code is identical.
Really? I let the loop run for 45 minutes last night before killing it,
without a memory allocation error. I'll check again.
Chet
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
Chet Ramey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> That code is quite different in bash-3.2, and the memory leak is gone.
I can still reproduce it with 3.2.25, where the code is identical.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg,
Lars Ellenberg wrote:
> Bash Version: 3.1
> Patch Level: 17
> Release Status: release
>
> (debian etch, bash 3.1dfsg-8)
>
> Description:
> aparently I hit a memory leak in the read builtin.
>
> Repeat-By:
> yes | bash -c 'ulimit -v 1000; while read a ; do :; done'
>
> bash: x
Configuration Information [Automatically generated, do not change]:
Machine: i486
OS: linux-gnu
Compiler: gcc
Compilation CFLAGS: -DPROGRAM='bash' -DCONF_HOSTTYPE='i486'
-DCONF_OSTYPE='linux-gnu' -DCONF_MACHTYPE='i486-pc-linux-gnu'
-DCONF_VENDOR='pc' -DLOCALEDIR='/usr/share/locale' -DPACKAGE='ba
Hi,
I posted two patches for memory leaks in bash-3.0. One of them has
made it into bash-3.1, but the other has not. Here is the missing
one:
On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 06:10:07PM +, Tim Waugh wrote:
> There is at least one memory leak in the read builtin in bash-3.0. To
> demonstrate it, tr
There is at least one memory leak in the read builtin in bash-3.0. To
demonstrate it, try this test case:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173283#c10
There is a link to a file, nonblock.c, which you should compile like
'make nonblock'. Then run the short script to see the
10 matches
Mail list logo