Linda Walsh wrote:
I seem to remember some discussion of this before --
not being able to use -v to check if a hash was defined,
but having it "work"(?) w/arrays?
So instead of "-v" on an array/hash name only looking at the
value of [0] (for either), can it be enhanced to check the
type o
I seem to remember some discussion of this before --
not being able to use -v to check if a hash was defined,
but having it "work"(?) w/arrays?
I think, though, the fact that it operates inconsistently
makes it a bug. I.e. if always work or fail, at least it
is behaving consistently, feels wrong