Am 06.03.2013 01:03, schrieb Linda Walsh:
>
> John Kearney wrote:
>> The example is bad anyway as you normally don't want to parallelize disk
>> io , due to seek overhead and io bottle neck congestion. This example
>> will be slower and more likely to damage your disk than simply using mv
>> on its
John Kearney wrote:
> The example is bad anyway as you normally don't want to parallelize disk
> io , due to seek overhead and io bottle neck congestion. This example
> will be slower and more likely to damage your disk than simply using mv
> on its own. but thats another discussion.
---
Am 03.03.2013 01:40, schrieb Chet Ramey:
>> this is actually more disturbing.
>>
>> ls | parallel mv {} destdir
>>
>> find -type f -print0 | xargs -0 -I{} -P /bin/mv {}
> If we're really going to pick nits here, those two aren't really identical.
>
> You'd probably want something like
>
> find .
> this is actually more disturbing.
>
> ls | parallel mv {} destdir
>
> find -type f -print0 | xargs -0 -I{} -P /bin/mv {}
If we're really going to pick nits here, those two aren't really identical.
You'd probably want something like
find . -depth 1 \! -name '.*' -print0
to start.
Chet
--
I'm getting a chance to look at this.
> this is actually more disturbing.
>
> ls | parallel mv {} destdir
That's straight from the parallel manual. Pretty much all of the examples
are from the parallel manual.
Ole Tange, GNU parallel's author, supplied the text and examples. It
would be more
Am 26.02.2013 03:36, schrieb Linda Walsh:
>
> Chet Ramey wrote:
>> On 2/25/13 8:07 PM, Linda Walsh wrote:
>>> Chet Ramey wrote:
On 2/16/13 3:50 AM, Pierre Gaston wrote:
> I don't quite see the point of having gnu parallel discussed in the
> bash reference manual.
I was asked to ad
Chet Ramey wrote:
> On 2/25/13 8:07 PM, Linda Walsh wrote:
>> Chet Ramey wrote:
>>> On 2/16/13 3:50 AM, Pierre Gaston wrote:
I don't quite see the point of having gnu parallel discussed in the
bash reference manual.
>>> I was asked to add that in May, 2010 by Ole Tange and Richard Stall
Chet Ramey wrote:
> On 2/16/13 3:50 AM, Pierre Gaston wrote:
>> I don't quite see the point of having gnu parallel discussed in the
>> bash reference manual.
> I was asked to add that in May, 2010 by Ole Tange and Richard Stallman.
Maybe now that it was done, it can be removed?
Or did they as
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 4:54 PM, Chet Ramey wrote:
> On 2/16/13 9:57 AM, Chris Down wrote:
>
> > Count me also in favour of removal of this section. At best the entire
> > section needs a complete rewrite, but why on earth we have a whole
> section
> > dedicated to a nonstandard external tool is
On 2/16/13 9:57 AM, Chris Down wrote:
> Count me also in favour of removal of this section. At best the entire
> section needs a complete rewrite, but why on earth we have a whole section
> dedicated to a nonstandard external tool is kind of baffling.
Consider the FSF's perspective. The fact tha
On 2/16/13 3:50 AM, Pierre Gaston wrote:
> I don't quite see the point of having gnu parallel discussed in the
> bash reference manual.
> http://www.gnu.org/software/bash/manual/bashref.html#GNU-Parallel
I was asked to add that in May, 2010 by Ole Tange and Richard Stallman.
Chet
--
``The lyf s
On 16 February 2013 20:54, John Kearney wrote:
> Am 16.02.2013 09:50, schrieb Pierre Gaston:
> > I don't quite see the point of having gnu parallel discussed in the
> > bash reference manual.
> > http://www.gnu.org/software/bash/manual/bashref.html#GNU-Parallel
> > I don't argue that it can be a
Am 16.02.2013 09:50, schrieb Pierre Gaston:
> I don't quite see the point of having gnu parallel discussed in the
> bash reference manual.
> http://www.gnu.org/software/bash/manual/bashref.html#GNU-Parallel
> I don't argue that it can be a useful tool, but then you might as well
> discuss sed awk g
I don't quite see the point of having gnu parallel discussed in the
bash reference manual.
http://www.gnu.org/software/bash/manual/bashref.html#GNU-Parallel
I don't argue that it can be a useful tool, but then you might as well
discuss sed awk grep make find etc..
Or even the ones not part of the
14 matches
Mail list logo
