On Feb 27, 2009, at 4:02 PM, Chet Ramey wrote:
Ben wrote:
I ran into a problem using process substitution
This will be fixed in the next version.
thank you!
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
i've noticed
Ben Hyde wrote:
> I ran into a problem using process substitution. A much reduced version is
> show below. The function f2 has the problem, the function f1 does not.
> Are
> there is some facts about the life cycle of the files created by
> process substitution I don't appreciate? - ben
This w
Greg Wooledge eeg.ccf.org> writes:
> For whatever it's worth, I can reproduce this behavior on both Linux
> and OpenBSD (which use /dev/fd/*), in several versions of bash, but
> not on HP-UX (which uses named pipes).
I can reproduce it also with bash 4 and bash 3.2 under gentoo
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 09:26:29AM -0500, Ben Hyde wrote:
> f2(){
> date
> cat $1
> }
> f2 <(echo l8r)
> Fri Feb 27 09:18:45 EST 2009
> cat: /dev/fd/63: Bad file descriptor
For whatever it's worth, I can reproduce this behavior on both Linux
and OpenBSD (which use /dev/fd/*), in several vers
I ran into a problem using process substitution. A much reduced
version is
show below. The function f2 has the problem, the function f1 does
not. Are
there is some facts about the life cycle of the files created by
process substitution I don't appreciate? - ben
bash-3.2$ ls -l /tmp/foo
-r
