On Tue, 2019-09-24 at 09:29 -0400, Chet Ramey wrote:
> On 9/24/19 3:04 AM, Mischa Baars wrote:
> > Hi Kerin,
> >
> > That indeed solves the problem in 'accesstime.sh', although I would
> > recommend some sort of reference from the bash manpage to the mount
> > manpage.
> >
> > Did you have a look
On 9/24/19 3:04 AM, Mischa Baars wrote:
> Hi Kerin,
>
> That indeed solves the problem in 'accesstime.sh', although I would
> recommend some sort of reference from the bash manpage to the mount
> manpage.
>
> Did you have a look at the 'conditional.sh' script too? Looks like the
> '-N' switch com
Strange, it seems the replies did come through. So have you seen them?
Let's try the gnome mail client, at least I got a receipt this time.
Regards,
Mischa.
On Tue, 2019-09-24 at 09:04 +0200, Mischa Baars wrote:
> Hi Kerin,
>
> That indeed solves the problem in 'accesstime.sh', although I would
Hi Kerin,
That indeed solves the problem in 'accesstime.sh', although I would
recommend some sort of reference from the bash manpage to the mount
manpage.
Did you have a look at the 'conditional.sh' script too? Looks like the
'-N' switch compares only the integer part of the timestamp seconds.
R
Hi Kerin and Chet,
Testing mailing list. My earlier replies didn't come through.
Regards,
Mischa.
On Tue, 2019-07-09 at 11:16 +0100, k...@plushkava.net wrote:
> Hi Mischa,
>
> On Tue, 09 Jul 2019 09:05:45 +0200
> Mischa Baars wrote:
>
> > Hi Kerin,
> >
> > That indeed solves the problem in '
On 7/9/19 12:12 PM, k...@plushkava.net wrote:
>> The code just returns (atime <= mtime), and has since 1997. It uses the
>> st_atime and st_mtime fields. I should update it to use timespecs if
>> they're available, and (mtime > atime) might work closer to your
>> expectations.
>>
>> After the call
On Tue, 9 Jul 2019 10:48:32 -0400
Chet Ramey wrote:
> On 7/9/19 6:16 AM, k...@plushkava.net wrote:
>
> >> Did you have a look at the 'conditional.sh' script too? Looks like the
> >> '-N' switch compares only the integer part of the timestamp seconds.
> >
> > The stat structure supports timesta
On 7/9/19 6:16 AM, k...@plushkava.net wrote:
>> Did you have a look at the 'conditional.sh' script too? Looks like the '-N'
>> switch compares only the integer part of the timestamp seconds.
>
> The stat structure supports timestamp fields of nanosecond granularity since
> POSIX.1-2008, so it s
Hi Mischa,
On Tue, 09 Jul 2019 09:05:45 +0200
Mischa Baars wrote:
> Hi Kerin,
>
> That indeed solves the problem in 'accesstime.sh', although I would recommend
> some sort of reference from the bash manpage to the mount manpage.
>
> Did you have a look at the 'conditional.sh' script too? Look
On Mon, 08 Jul 2019 09:29:19 +0200
"mjbaars1977.bug-bash" wrote:
> Hi,I'm having some difficulties with the file access time and the file
> modification time. Scripts are attached for your convenience.Regards,Mischa
> Baars.Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.
If you are using Linux, you sh
Hi,I'm having some difficulties with the file access time and the file
modification time. Scripts are attached for your convenience.Regards,Mischa
Baars.Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.
conditional.sh
Description: application/sh
accesstime.sh
Description: application/sh
11 matches
Mail list logo
