Chet Ramey wrote:
>> Will setting pipefail have any effect on this? If not, then is there a
>> way to make bash abort when one of the pipeline components fails,
>> without too much additional code?
Not easily.
>> On the other hand, to match the documentation, you would also have to
>> fix cases
Marcin Owsiany wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 04:09:49PM -0400, Chet Ramey wrote:
>>> That's the case that's behaving correctly, even though it's not the
>>> way you want it to behave. Neither case should terminate the shell.
>>> Only a simple command should terminate the shell, and a pipeline i
On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 04:09:49PM -0400, Chet Ramey wrote:
> > That's the case that's behaving correctly, even though it's not the
> > way you want it to behave. Neither case should terminate the shell.
> > Only a simple command should terminate the shell, and a pipeline is
> > not a simple comma
> That's the case that's behaving correctly, even though it's not the
> way you want it to behave. Neither case should terminate the shell.
> Only a simple command should terminate the shell, and a pipeline is
> not a simple command, even if its components are. Chet is saying that
> the next bash
Marcin Owsiany <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 09:22:30AM -0400, Chet Ramey wrote:
>> This bug only occurs when errexit is enabled and the final element of a
>> pipeline is a simple command that returns a non-zero exit status.
>
> Well, if the final element in the pipeline is a
On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 09:22:30AM -0400, Chet Ramey wrote:
> Marcin Owsiany wrote:
>
> > I expected that if a simple pipeline failure causes the shell to exit, and
> > a simple for loop failure causes it to exit, then a failure in their
> > combination would also cause an exit. However it is no
Marcin Owsiany wrote:
> I expected that if a simple pipeline failure causes the shell to exit, and a
> simple for loop failure causes it to exit, then a failure in their
> combination would also cause an exit. However it is not so.
You've found a probable bug, but it's not where you think. Eac
Hello,
I have these three very simple scripts. The only difference between them is the
penultimate line of each of them:
| $ head -n 6 just_pipe just_for_loop pipe_and_for_loop
| ==> just_pipe <==
| set -e
| trap 'echo aborted in line $LINENO' ERR
| echo start
| true | false
| echo ended succes
