> On Apr 19, 2021, at 7:18 AM, Greg Wooledge wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 01:16:48AM -0400, Grisha Levit wrote:
>> I think you can do something similar to the patch directly in the shell by
>> temporarily unsetting HISTFILE and then deleting history entries in a
>> certain range and restori
On 4/18/21 7:12 PM, Ananth Chellappa wrote:
Chet, Lawrence,
Sincerely appreciate your time. Far as I understand, there is no
way to accomplish what I want - concisely : *get a true private mode* (no
logging to HISTFILE *OR* recall with history command after exiting
private-mode (togg
On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 01:16:48AM -0400, Grisha Levit wrote:
> I think you can do something similar to the patch directly in the shell by
> temporarily unsetting HISTFILE and then deleting history entries in a
> certain range and restoring HISTFILE when you are ready
I still think my solution fit
Thanks. Rube Goldberg would approve🙂
On Sun, Apr 18, 2021 at 10:17 PM Grisha Levit wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 18, 2021, 7:13 PM Ananth Chellappa
> wrote:
>
>> Far as I understand, there is no
>> way to accomplish what I want - concisely : *get a true private mode* (no
>> logging to HISTFILE *OR* reca
On Sun, Apr 18, 2021, 7:13 PM Ananth Chellappa wrote:
> Far as I understand, there is no
> way to accomplish what I want - concisely : *get a true private mode* (no
> logging to HISTFILE *OR* recall with history command after exiting
> private-mode (toggle of history using set -/+ o) *without sac
But have I conveyed the functionality I'm seeking? Naseeba's version works
perfectly..
I agree I can't assert the existing version doesn't provide it. I'm happy
to learn how to use it to meet my needs.. The best change is always no
change.
On Sun, Apr 18, 2021 at 9:18 PM Lawrence Velázquez wrote
> On Apr 18, 2021, at 7:12 PM, Ananth Chellappa wrote:
>
> Even this guy https://paulh.consulting/
> thought it was easy before deciding it was worth $500 of his time to try
> adding it :)
I don't know who "this guy" is. There are a lot of very skilled
developers who aren't specifically versed
On Sun, Apr 18, 2021 at 04:12:10PM -0700, Ananth Chellappa wrote:
> Sincerely appreciate your time. Far as I understand, there is no
> way to accomplish what I want - concisely : *get a true private mode* (no
> logging to HISTFILE *OR* recall with history command after exiting
> private-mo
Chet, Lawrence,
Sincerely appreciate your time. Far as I understand, there is no
way to accomplish what I want - concisely : *get a true private mode* (no
logging to HISTFILE *OR* recall with history command after exiting
private-mode (toggle of history using set -/+ o) *without sacrificin
On 4/18/21 12:03 AM, Ananth Chellappa wrote:
Hello Brian and Chet,
Please consider merging the enhancement made by Naseeba described
here :
What is the ultimate goal of this change? And, whatever it is, why is it
better than currently-available ways to accomplish the same thing?
--
`
Hi,
> On Apr 18, 2021, at 12:03 AM, Ananth Chellappa wrote:
>
> Hello Brian and Chet,
> Please consider merging the enhancement made by Naseeba described
> here :
>
> https://github.com/ananthchellappa/bash-5.1/blob/main/README.md
In your future emails, you may want to consider
- writ
Hello Brian and Chet,
Please consider merging the enhancement made by Naseeba described
here :
https://github.com/ananthchellappa/bash-5.1/blob/main/README.md
Thanks,
Ananth
12 matches
Mail list logo
