Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Friday 14 April 2006 22:52, Chet Ramey wrote:
>>>
>>> foo=$( #'
>>> echo hi)
>> This has already been fixed for the next version.
>
> when you say "next version" you mean like bash-3.2 right ?
Yeah, I mean like bash-3.2. :-)
Chet
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so
On Friday 14 April 2006 22:52, Chet Ramey wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > not a regression as bash-2.05 / bash-3.0 also barf on this ... i imagine
> > someone has already filed this, but i couldnt seem to find it in the
> > mailing lists ...
> >
> > foo=$( #'
> > echo hi)
>
> This has already be
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> not a regression as bash-2.05 / bash-3.0 also barf on this ... i imagine
> someone has already filed this, but i couldnt seem to find it in the mailing
> lists ...
>
> foo=$( #'
> echo hi)
This has already been fixed for the next version.
Chet
--
``The lyf so short, th
not a regression as bash-2.05 / bash-3.0 also barf on this ... i imagine
someone has already filed this, but i couldnt seem to find it in the mailing
lists ...
foo=$( #'
echo hi)
now the neat thing is that with bash-3.1 (unlike older versions), the
open/close parens are detected properly when