Rolf Brudeseth wrote:
> Andreas Schwab wrote:
>>
>>
>> ca() { (cd "$@" && pwd -P); }
>>
>> Andreas.
>>
>>
> That works if I want the path to a directory, but it does not let me
> operate on files within the directory.
Once you have the pathname to a directory, you have dozens of tools
available
Andreas Schwab wrote:
ca() { (cd "$@" && pwd -P); }
Andreas.
That works if I want the path to a directory, but it does not let me
operate on files within the directory.
I would also like to do this:
ro...@otto:~/test/B/BB$ ca ../b|xargs cat
hello
Rolf
Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Thursday 12 February 2009 04:58:09 Andreas Schwab wrote:
Mike Frysinger writes:
On Wednesday 11 February 2009 23:38:10 Rolf Brudeseth wrote:
I would like to propose a new command for bash:
ca [path]
It returns the canonical path based on the current w
Andreas Schwab wrote:
ca() { (cd "$@" && pwd -P); }
Andreas.
That works if I want the path to a directory, but it does not let me
operate on files within the directory.
I would also like to do this:
ro...@otto:~/test/B/BB$ ca ../b|xargs cat
hello
Rolf
Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Thursday 12 February 2009 04:58:09 Andreas Schwab wrote:
Mike Frysinger writes:
On Wednesday 11 February 2009 23:38:10 Rolf Brudeseth wrote:
I would like to propose a new command for bash:
ca [path]
It returns the canonical path based on the current w
Andreas Schwab wrote:Andreas Schwab wrote:
ca() { (cd "$@" && pwd -P); }
Andreas.
That works if I want the path to a directory, but it does not let me
operate on files within the directory.
I would also like to do this:
ro...@otto:~/test/B/BB$ ca ../b|xargs cat
hello
Rolf
Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Thursday 12 February 2009 04:58:09 Andreas Schwab wrote:
Mike Frysinger writes:
On Wednesday 11 February 2009 23:38:10 Rolf Brudeseth wrote:
I would like to propose a new command for bash:
ca [path]
It returns the canonical path based on the current work
Mike Frysinger writes:
> On Thursday 12 February 2009 04:58:09 Andreas Schwab wrote:
>> Mike Frysinger writes:
>> > On Wednesday 11 February 2009 23:38:10 Rolf Brudeseth wrote:
>> >> I would like to propose a new command for bash:
>> >>
>> >> ca [path]
>> >>
>> >> It returns the canonical path b
On Thursday 12 February 2009 04:58:09 Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Mike Frysinger writes:
> > On Wednesday 11 February 2009 23:38:10 Rolf Brudeseth wrote:
> >> I would like to propose a new command for bash:
> >>
> >> ca [path]
> >>
> >> It returns the canonical path based on the current working direct
Mike Frysinger writes:
> On Wednesday 11 February 2009 23:38:10 Rolf Brudeseth wrote:
>> I would like to propose a new command for bash:
>>
>> ca [path]
>>
>> It returns the canonical path based on the current working directory and
>> entered path.
>>
>>
>> If the current working directory has be
On Wednesday 11 February 2009 23:38:10 Rolf Brudeseth wrote:
> I would like to propose a new command for bash:
>
> ca [path]
>
> It returns the canonical path based on the current working directory and
> entered path.
>
>
> If the current working directory has been traversed through a symbolic
> li
I would like to propose a new command for bash:
ca [path]
It returns the canonical path based on the current working directory and
entered path.
If the current working directory has been traversed through a symbolic
link, then listing a higher level path using dotdot's do not always show
I
12 matches
Mail list logo
