On 5/16/24 3:40 PM, Collin Funk wrote:
Hi Chet,
On 5/16/24 7:25 AM, Chet Ramey wrote:
Yes. This was inspired by
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/2024-04/msg00158.html
I'm not sure if you have dealt with this particular one yet, but I
would just get rid of the u_char, u_short, u_lo
Hi Chet,
On 5/16/24 7:25 AM, Chet Ramey wrote:
> Yes. This was inspired by
>
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/2024-04/msg00158.html
I'm not sure if you have dealt with this particular one yet, but I
would just get rid of the u_char, u_short, u_long, types. They are old
BSD stuff tha
On 5/16/24 12:21 AM, Grisha Levit wrote:
Since 9c430f6b changed some files to no longer include config.h,
building with glibc and an -std= in CFLAGS fails because getopt,
used in support/bashversion.c and mksyntax.c, is guarded by
_POSIX_C_SOURCE >= 2 || _XOPEN_SOURCE
Yes. This was inspired by
Since 9c430f6b changed some files to no longer include config.h,
building with glibc and an -std= in CFLAGS fails because getopt,
used in support/bashversion.c and mksyntax.c, is guarded by
_POSIX_C_SOURCE >= 2 || _XOPEN_SOURCE
support/bashversion.c:69:17: warning: implicit declaration of function
