Re: bug#9129: Built-in printf Sits Awkwardly with UDP.

2011-07-24 Thread Chet Ramey
On 7/22/11 12:32 PM, Ralph Corderoy wrote: > Hi Jim, > >>> On 07/20/2011 07:34 AM, Ralph Corderoy wrote: BTW, the code for the built-in printf has a bug. For negative field-widths it negates a negative integer without checking it will fit. E.g. on this 64-bit machine

Re: bug#9129: Built-in printf Sits Awkwardly with UDP.

2011-07-22 Thread Ralph Corderoy
Hi Jim, > > On 07/20/2011 07:34 AM, Ralph Corderoy wrote: > > > BTW, the code for the built-in printf has a bug. For negative > > > field-widths it negates a negative integer without checking it > > > will fit. E.g. on this 64-bit machine > > > > > > $ printf '%-9223372036854775808s.\n' foo

Re: bug#9129: Built-in printf Sits Awkwardly with UDP.

2011-07-22 Thread Jim Meyering
retitle 9129 printf: RFE: reject field width larger than INT_MAX tags 9129 notabug thanks Eric Blake wrote: > [adding coreutils] > > On 07/20/2011 07:34 AM, Ralph Corderoy wrote: >> BTW, the code for the built-in printf has a bug. For negative >> field-widths it negates a negative integer without