Hello,
Na Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 01:47:43PM -0400, Chet Ramey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
pisal(a):
> > after applying bash32-001..bash-018 patches, i can't apply bash32-019.
> > is this expected?
>
> Nope. I just applied patches 1-25 to a freshly-unpacked copy of bash-3.2
> without any failures.
okay,
> hi,
>
> http://frugalware.org/~vmiklos/logs/bash-3.2_025-1-i686.log
>
> after applying bash32-001..bash-018 patches, i can't apply bash32-019.
> is this expected?
Nope. I just applied patches 1-25 to a freshly-unpacked copy of bash-3.2
without any failures.
Chet
--
``The lyf so short, the
hi,
http://frugalware.org/~vmiklos/logs/bash-3.2_025-1-i686.log
after applying bash32-001..bash-018 patches, i can't apply bash32-019.
is this expected?
thanks,
- VMiklos
pgpL70fu2zUOk.pgp
Description: PGP signature
