On 19 May 2016 14:37, Chet Ramey wrote:
> On 5/16/16 10:36 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >> Because many traditional implementations of mktemp/mkstemp suck.
> >
> > and many modern implementations work perfectly fine. why is the default
> > to penalize good/fixed versions ? how about we flip this
On 5/16/16 10:36 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> Because many traditional implementations of mktemp/mkstemp suck.
>
> and many modern implementations work perfectly fine. why is the default
> to penalize good/fixed versions ? how about we flip this in config-top.h
> like the attached patch ?
Yes,
On 16 May 2016 10:02, Chet Ramey wrote:
> On 5/13/16 2:40 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > i was pointed at a bug report for FreeBSD systems [1] where running lots
> > of processes in parallel would randomly fail with errors like:
> > cannot make pipe for process substitution: File exists
> >
> > u
On 5/13/16 2:40 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> i was pointed at a bug report for FreeBSD systems [1] where running lots
> of processes in parallel would randomly fail with errors like:
> cannot make pipe for process substitution: File exists
>
> upstream FreeBSD addressed this by defining USE_MKTEM
i was pointed at a bug report for FreeBSD systems [1] where running lots
of processes in parallel would randomly fail with errors like:
cannot make pipe for process substitution: File exists
upstream FreeBSD addressed this by defining USE_MKTEMP [2] & USE_MKSTEMP
[3] when building bash. looking
