Re: Usage of __P vs PARAMS in histfile.c

2015-04-09 Thread Chet Ramey
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 4/8/15 8:47 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > do you still support such old systems that require this pre-ANSI prototypes ? > > pretty much all other GNU projects have dropped support for them. I will drop support for them, too. - -- ``The lyf so s

Re: Usage of __P vs PARAMS in histfile.c

2015-04-08 Thread Mike Frysinger
On 08 Apr 2015 14:13, Chet Ramey wrote: > On 4/8/15 11:25 AM, Evan Gates wrote: > > I tried compiling bash with musl-gcc and failed due to the __P macros > > in histfile.c > > > > While digging around it appears that __P is defined in stdc.h, but > > histfile.c indirectly includes rlstdc.h istead.

Re: Usage of __P vs PARAMS in histfile.c

2015-04-08 Thread Chet Ramey
On 4/8/15 11:25 AM, Evan Gates wrote: > I tried compiling bash with musl-gcc and failed due to the __P macros > in histfile.c > > While digging around it appears that __P is defined in stdc.h, but > histfile.c indirectly includes rlstdc.h istead. rlstdc.h defines an > identical macro with the name

Usage of __P vs PARAMS in histfile.c

2015-04-08 Thread Evan Gates
I tried compiling bash with musl-gcc and failed due to the __P macros in histfile.c While digging around it appears that __P is defined in stdc.h, but histfile.c indirectly includes rlstdc.h istead. rlstdc.h defines an identical macro with the name PARAMS instead of __P In my extraordinarily limi