Re: SIGCHLD traps shouldn't recurse

On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 10:54 AM L A Walsh wrote: > > > On 2021/04/06 00:23, Oğuz wrote: > > 5 Nisan 2021 Pazartesi tarihinde L A Walsh > > yazdı: > > > > On 2021/04/03 00:41, Oğuz wrote: > > > > but I > > don't think it's useful at all because the numb

Re: SIGCHLD traps shouldn't recurse

On 2021/04/06 00:23, Oğuz wrote: 5 Nisan 2021 Pazartesi tarihinde L A Walsh > yazdı: On 2021/04/03 00:41, Oğuz wrote: but I don't think it's useful at all because the number of pending traps keeps piling up, and there is no way to r

Re: SIGCHLD traps shouldn't recurse

5 Nisan 2021 Pazartesi tarihinde L A Walsh yazdı: > On 2021/04/03 00:41, Oğuz wrote: > >> but I >> don't think it's useful at all because the number of pending traps keeps >> piling up, and there is no way to reset that number. If there is no real >> use case for recursive SIGCHLD traps (which I

Re: SIGCHLD traps shouldn't recurse

On 2021/04/03 00:41, Oğuz wrote: but I don't think it's useful at all because the number of pending traps keeps piling up, and there is no way to reset that number. If there is no real use case for recursive SIGCHLD traps (which I can't think of any), I think this should change; no SIGCHLD trap

SIGCHLD traps shouldn't recurse

See: $ trap uname chld $ uname -sr Linux 5.4.0-66-generic Linux $ uname -sr Linux 5.4.0-66-generic Linux Linux $ uname -sr Linux 5.4.0-66-generic Linux Linux Linux $ $ trap - chld $ trap date chld $ uname -sr Linux 5.4.0-66-ge