Re: SEGV on unbounded recursion

2008-03-09 Thread Tomas Janousek
Hello, On Sat, Mar 08, 2008 at 04:35:02PM -0500, Chet Ramey wrote: > I'm not inclined to change the current behavior. Bash is perfectly > happy to allow people to shoot themselves in the foot. We all agree > that fixed-limit recursion is not the way to go, and I don't think the > effort involved

Re: SEGV on unbounded recursion

2008-03-08 Thread Chet Ramey
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Configuration Information [Automatically generated, do not change]: Machine: i686 OS: linux-gnu Compiler: gcc Compilation CFLAGS: -DPROGRAM='bash' -DCONF_HOSTTYPE='i686' -DCONF_OSTYPE='linux-gnu' -DCONF_MACHTYPE='i686-redhat-linux-gnu' -DCONF_VENDOR='redhat' -DLOCALEDI

Re: SEGV on unbounded recursion

2008-03-06 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 3/6/2008 8:04 AM: | | Fix: | ksh has a fixed recursion depth limit (4096 on 32 bit machines, not | that many). I'm not sure we want this. We don't want a fixed recursion limit - it's against GNU philosoph

SEGV on unbounded recursion

2008-03-06 Thread tjanouse
Configuration Information [Automatically generated, do not change]: Machine: i686 OS: linux-gnu Compiler: gcc Compilation CFLAGS: -DPROGRAM='bash' -DCONF_HOSTTYPE='i686' -DCONF_OSTYPE='linux-gnu' -DCONF_MACHTYPE='i686-redhat-linux-gnu' -DCONF_VENDOR='redhat' -DLOCALEDIR='/usr/share/locale' -DPAC