I think, memory footprint doesn't really matter when standard availlable ram
is lot away...
But *time required to ``fork''* could matter:
QuickTest() {
local TIMEFORMAT='%R ( %U + %S )';
printf "%-10s: " "${1##*/}";
time for i in {1..1000};
do
res=$("$@");
done;
On 3/23/21 4:46 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> On Mär 22 2021, Dale R. Worley wrote:
>
>> Greg Wooledge writes:
>>> Partly true. seq(1) is a Linux thing, and was never part of any
>>> tradition, until Linux people started doing it.
>>
>> Huh. I started with Ultrix, and then SunOS, but don't rememb
Andreas Schwab writes:
>> I've never tracked down why, but the Perl executable is a lot smaller
>> than the Bash executable.
>
> Is it?
>
> $ size /usr/bin/perl /bin/bash
>textdata bss dec hex filename
> 2068661 27364 648 2096673 1ffe21 /usr/bin/perl
> 1056850 22188
On Mär 22 2021, Dale R. Worley wrote:
> Greg Wooledge writes:
>> Partly true. seq(1) is a Linux thing, and was never part of any
>> tradition, until Linux people started doing it.
>
> Huh. I started with Ultrix, and then SunOS, but don't remember learning
> seq at a later date.
According to
Greg Wooledge writes:
> Partly true. seq(1) is a Linux thing, and was never part of any
> tradition, until Linux people started doing it.
Huh. I started with Ultrix, and then SunOS, but don't remember learning
seq at a later date.
> (Before POSIX, it involved using expr(1) for every increment,
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 09:10:06PM -0400, Dale R. Worley wrote:
> Alex fxmbsw7 Ratchev writes:
> > yea well it does wonders, however was looking for a way without spawning
> > externals like gawk.. maybe in future there will be =)
>
> Traditionally, shell scripts depended on external binaries to
Alex fxmbsw7 Ratchev writes:
> yea well it does wonders, however was looking for a way without spawning
> externals like gawk.. maybe in future there will be =)
Traditionally, shell scripts depended on external binaries to do a lot
of the processing. At the least, what newer shells do with "{NNN
ehe :))
you tell me rather a good pike beginnings resource
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 9:42 AM Andreas Schwab
wrote:
> On Mär 19 2021, Alex fxmbsw7 Ratchev wrote:
>
> > yea well it does wonders, however was looking for a way without spawning
> > externals like gawk.. maybe in future there will be =
On Mär 19 2021, Alex fxmbsw7 Ratchev wrote:
> yea well it does wonders, however was looking for a way without spawning
> externals like gawk.. maybe in future there will be =)
You know where to get perl or python.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB4
yea well it does wonders, however was looking for a way without spawning
externals like gawk.. maybe in future there will be =)
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 2:02 AM Dale R. Worley wrote:
> Alex fxmbsw7 Ratchev writes:
> > there is way to crop data to wanted, by cropping the exclulsions away
> > but
Alex fxmbsw7 Ratchev writes:
> there is way to crop data to wanted, by cropping the exclulsions away
> but what about a way to extract data, eg @( .. ) match
> not about using [[ =~ but only var internal stuff
> .. or do i miss there something
If you want to do a pattern-match against a string, t
On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 02:01:12PM +0100, Alex fxmbsw7 Ratchev wrote:
> there is way to crop data to wanted, by cropping the exclulsions away
> but what about a way to extract data, eg @( .. ) match
> not about using [[ =~ but only var internal stuff
> .. or do i miss there something
This is reall
12 matches
Mail list logo