On Thursday, January 2, 2025, Martin D Kealey
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2 Jan 2025 at 14:25, Oğuz wrote:
>
>> I don't see any upsides either. What's the point?
>>
>
> New features don't have to make sense to everyone
>
If adding that feature involves merging 5k lines of unaudited code it
should do mor
On Thursday, January 2, 2025, Martin D Kealey
wrote:
>
> Do you see any downsides to this approach?
>
I don't see any upsides either. What's the point?
--
Oğuz
tests/run-all goes to some trouble to unset and/or unexport SHELLOPTS, but
it ignores BASHOPTS, which seems equally problematic.
This can be demonstrated by running « env
BASHOPTS=dotglob:extglob:gnu_errfmt:lastpipe:login_shell:nocaseglob:nocasematch:nullglob:shift_verbose:compat31
make tests »
(I
On 12/14/24 6:18 AM, Martin D Kealey wrote:
Where there are some “expected” differences, could these be filtered? In
particular,
- sort the output of “trap” alphabetically, rather than leave it in
numeric signal-number order?
I'll look at this, this might be useful.
- compare wh
On 12/14/24 9:35 AM, Martin D Kealey wrote:
(see first part for background)
I've patched Bash to merge “shopt” and “set -o”, and now “make tests”
reports some minor differences. I would like some feedback on whether
they're significant enough to warrant fixing.
I never did hear why exactly you
On 12/14/24 6:18 AM, Martin D Kealey wrote:
I'm trying to make sure that my modified version of Bash passes all the
tests, and in the process I'm finding some, erm, oddities.
Firstly, what seems to be a bug:
Looking in tests/printf7.sub it has
INT_MAX=$(getconf INT_MAX 2>/dev/null)
[ -z "$INT_M
