Re: loadables/rm not POSIX compliant

2019-05-29 Thread Tim Rühsen
On 5/29/19 12:53 PM, Tim Rühsen wrote: > On 5/28/19 6:04 PM, G. Branden Robinson wrote: >> At 2019-05-28T17:01:52+0200, Tim Rühsen wrote: >>> Since distributions like Debian doesn't deliver binaries from >>> examples/, >> >> That doesn't sound accurate to me. The Debian Policy Manual, §12.6, >> en

Re: loadables/rm not POSIX compliant

2019-05-29 Thread Tim Rühsen
On 5/28/19 6:04 PM, G. Branden Robinson wrote: > At 2019-05-28T17:01:52+0200, Tim Rühsen wrote: >> Since distributions like Debian doesn't deliver binaries from >> examples/, > > That doesn't sound accurate to me. The Debian Policy Manual, §12.6, > encourages the shipping of examples: > > https:

Re: loadables/rm not POSIX compliant

2019-05-28 Thread Chet Ramey
On 5/28/19 12:15 PM, Eli Schwartz wrote: >> Might be better to ask about this on a Debian mailing list. > > Arch Linux provides the builtins in the main bash package, and we too > have most but not all. > > Looking at examples/loadables/Makefile.in, only the ones listed in > ALLPROG are installe

Re: loadables/rm not POSIX compliant

2019-05-28 Thread Eli Schwartz
On 5/28/19 12:09 PM, Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 02:04:10AM +1000, G. Branden Robinson wrote: >> In fact, the bash-doc package contains dozens of examples. However, I >> don't see anything named "rm". (I'm looking at bash-doc 5.0-4 in Debian >> 10, "buster".) > > Looks like th

Re: loadables/rm not POSIX compliant

2019-05-28 Thread Greg Wooledge
On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 02:04:10AM +1000, G. Branden Robinson wrote: > In fact, the bash-doc package contains dozens of examples. However, I > don't see anything named "rm". (I'm looking at bash-doc 5.0-4 in Debian > 10, "buster".) Looks like they're supposed to be in bash-builtins. wooledg:~$

Re: loadables/rm not POSIX compliant

2019-05-28 Thread G. Branden Robinson
At 2019-05-28T17:01:52+0200, Tim Rühsen wrote: > Since distributions like Debian doesn't deliver binaries from > examples/, That doesn't sound accurate to me. The Debian Policy Manual, §12.6, encourages the shipping of examples: https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-docs.html#examples In

Re: loadables/rm not POSIX compliant

2019-05-28 Thread Tim Rühsen
On 5/28/19 4:38 PM, Chet Ramey wrote: > On 5/28/19 8:32 AM, Tim Rühsen wrote: > >> configure: error: Your 'rm' program is bad, sorry. >> # >> >> Is it possible to fix the loadable 'rm' command ? >> Let me know if you want me to provide a patch. > > Well, it's hard to know exactly what the

Re: loadables/rm not POSIX compliant

2019-05-28 Thread Chet Ramey
On 5/28/19 11:01 AM, Tim Rühsen wrote: > Since distributions like Debian doesn't deliver binaries from examples/, > how can we get the rm loadable into builtins/ ? (What is missing that > has to be done). That's up to Debian. I'm not going to make it a full-fledged builtin. -- ``The lyf so sho

Re: loadables/rm not POSIX compliant

2019-05-28 Thread Eli Schwartz
On 5/28/19 10:38 AM, Chet Ramey wrote: > On 5/28/19 8:32 AM, Tim Rühsen wrote: > >> configure: error: Your 'rm' program is bad, sorry. >> # >> >> Is it possible to fix the loadable 'rm' command ? >> Let me know if you want me to provide a patch. > > Well, it's hard to know exactly what th

Re: loadables/rm not POSIX compliant

2019-05-28 Thread Chet Ramey
On 5/28/19 8:32 AM, Tim Rühsen wrote: > configure: error: Your 'rm' program is bad, sorry. > # > > Is it possible to fix the loadable 'rm' command ? > Let me know if you want me to provide a patch. Well, it's hard to know exactly what the problem is here, despite the volumes of text prod