2017-02-06 09:45:26 +0530, Jyoti B Tenginakai:
[...]
> Again I see that this printf we can use. But there are some scenarios where
> the o/p does not exactly match with echo. So still its good to have a way
> to pirnt -n /-e/-E with echo. Can this be considered as bug and can this be
> fixed?
[..
Depending on your use case, you could do something like:
$ echo $'\u2010'n
-n
On 06/02/2560 13:37, Clark Wang wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 12:15 PM, Jyoti B Tenginakai
> mailto:jyoti@in.ibm.com>> wrote:
>
> Thanks you all,
>
> Again I see that this printf we can use. But there are
On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 12:15 PM, Jyoti B Tenginakai
wrote:
Thanks you all,
>
> Again I see that this printf we can use. But there are some scenarios
> where the o/p does not exactly match with echo. So still its good to have a
> way to pirnt -n /-e/-E with echo. Can this be considered as bug and
nakai , Pierre Gaston
Cc: chet.ra...@case.edu, Sangamesh Mallayya
, "bug-bash@gnu.org"
Date: 02/02/2017 11:21 PM
Subject:Re: echo -n
On 2/2/17 11:56 AM, Jyoti B Tenginakai wrote:
> HI All,
>
> Thanks for your quick response.
2017-02-02 22:26:22 +0530, Jyoti B Tenginakai:
[...]
> I have tried using the printf instead of echo. But the issue with printf
> is , the behaviour is not consistent with what echo prints for all the
> inputs i.e.
> In my script I am generically using echo for all the options. If I have to
> use p
On 2/2/17 11:56 AM, Jyoti B Tenginakai wrote:
> HI All,
>
> Thanks for your quick response.
>
> I have tried using the printf instead of echo. But the issue with printf is
> , the behaviour is not consistent with what echo prints for all the inputs
> i.e.
> In my script I am generically using ech
On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 10:56 AM, Jyoti B Tenginakai
wrote:
> HI All,
>
> Thanks for your quick response.
>
> I have tried using the printf instead of echo. But the issue with printf
> is , the behaviour is not consistent with what echo prints for all the
> inputs i.e.
> In my script I am generica
On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 10:26:22PM +0530, Jyoti B Tenginakai wrote:
> I have tried using the printf instead of echo. But the issue with printf
> is , the behaviour is not consistent with what echo prints for all the
> inputs i.e.
But what echo prints is by definition inconsistent across platforms
Sangamesh Mallayya
Cc: "bug-bash@gnu.org" , Jyoti B Tenginakai
Date: 02/02/2017 08:45 PM
Subject:Re: echo -n
On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 11:02 AM, Sangamesh Mallayya <
sangamesh.sw...@in.ibm.com> wrote:
Hi,
description:
in bash echo -n , echo -e
El jue., feb. 2, 2017 9:00 AM, Sangamesh Mallayya <
sangamesh.sw...@in.ibm.com> escribió:
> [...]
>
> Please let us know if this a bug or do we have any other option to print
> -n ?
>
Use the printf builtin command. What you encountered is a known limitation
of the echo command, as specified by P
On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 11:02 AM, Sangamesh Mallayya <
sangamesh.sw...@in.ibm.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> description:
> in bash echo -n , echo -e , echo -E has a special meaning. But we do not
> have a way in bash shell if we want to print
> -n , -e and -E using echo command. Other shells supports print
On 02/02/2017 03:02 AM, Sangamesh Mallayya wrote:
> Hi,
>
> description:
> in bash echo -n , echo -e , echo -E has a special meaning. But we do not
> have a way in bash shell if we want to print
> -n , -e and -E using echo command.
There is NO portable way to print those strings using 'echo'.
On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 3:02 AM, Sangamesh Mallayya <
sangamesh.sw...@in.ibm.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> description:
> in bash echo -n , echo -e , echo -E has a special meaning. But we do not
> have a way in bash shell if we want to print
> -n , -e and -E using echo command. Other shells supports printi
On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 02:32:00PM +0530, Sangamesh Mallayya wrote:
> in bash echo -n , echo -e , echo -E has a special meaning. But we do not
> have a way in bash shell if we want to print
> -n , -e and -E using echo command. Other shells supports printing of
> -n/-e/-E options using echo comma
14 matches
Mail list logo
