Thank you for your response Philippe. I'm adding back the mailing lists so
that they can benefit from this response too.
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 5:58 AM, pg wrote:
>
>
>
> *Thank you, Eduardo, for these remarks... I tried to answer you questions
> - answers in black below. But anyway, may I sug
Chet Ramey wrote:
> On 6/23/18 3:44 PM, L A Walsh wrote:
> > Seems like the original missed being sent toe the bug-bash alias.
>
> It was not posted to bug-bash.
For bug-bash was in the hold queue for human moderation. Although it
seems off topic for this mailing list it has already had three re
On 6/23/18 3:44 PM, L A Walsh wrote:
>
> What's the context for this? FWIW, removing non-bug-bash-subscribers
> (that I know of), as my question is aimed, I guess, at Eduardo,
> but not sure if it was posted to bash list or not?
It was not posted to bug-bash.
--
``The lyf so short, the craft s
Seems like the original missed being sent toe the bug-bash alias.
But I'm curious...
What's the context for this? FWIW, removing non-bug-bash-subscribers
(that I know of), as my question is aimed, I guess, at Eduardo,
but not sure if it was posted to bash list or not?
Maybe I just missed it?
T
On Sat, Jun 23, 2018 at 12:08 PM, pg wrote:
[...]
> Description: BASHJ - ANNOUNCE TO THE DEVELOPMENT TEAM OF BASH
>
> I am pleased to inform you about bashj - a bash 'mutant' with java
> support.
> This product opens numerous very interesting fields to bash developers.
I have a few questi
