Re: Trailing null fields are discarded while leading ones are preserved

2006-12-21 Thread Stahlman Family
- Original Message - From: "Chet Ramey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Stahlman Family" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: ; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2006 7:26 AM Subject: Re: Trailing null fields are discarded while leading ones are prese

Re: Trailing null fields are discarded while leading ones are preserved

2006-12-20 Thread Chet Ramey
Stahlman Family wrote: > Ok. I have found an IEEE interpretation for 1003.2-1992 3.6.5 > (interpretation #98) on the web, and I see that the behavior is correct. > The thing that wasn't quite clarified by the clarification is the > question: "If IFS serves only to terminate fields, then how is it

Re: Trailing null fields are discarded while leading ones are preserved

2006-12-20 Thread Stahlman Family
- Original Message - From: "Chet Ramey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Stahlman Family" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: ; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 9:00 AM Subject: Re: Trailing null fields are discarded while leading ones are preserv

Re: Trailing null fields are discarded while leading ones are preserved

2006-12-19 Thread Chet Ramey
Stahlman Family wrote: > I guess the question is, what is meant by "delimits a field" in the > following excerpt from the Bash manual? > > "Any character in IFS that is not IFS whitespace, along with any > adjacent IFS whitespace characters, delimits a field." > > I suppose I'm interpreting it t