Bob Proulx writes:
> For an executable script I use no suffix at all. It matters not if
> the script is a bash script, sh, ksh, perl, ruby, or whatever.
Assuming it uses the appropriate shebang.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756
On Sun, 11 Jul 2010, Peng Yu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think that that may not be a unique naming convention for bash
> script filenames. But I use the following.
>
> For an executable bash script I use the suffix .sh. For a bash script
> that is only source-able but runnable, I use the suffix .bashrc.
Peng Yu wrote:
> For an executable bash script I use the suffix .sh. For a bash script
> that is only source-able but runnable, I use the suffix .bashrc.
>
> People may use different conventions. I just want to see what most
> people use and follow the common practice. Could anybody give me any
>
