On 1/15/11 12:28 AM, Chris F.A. Johnson wrote:
> On Mon, 17 May 2010, Chet Ramey wrote:
>
>> On 4/15/10 11:56 PM, DennisW wrote:
>>> Mapfile would be that much more powerful if the callback function had
>>> access to the current line. Is there any chance this might be added in
>>> the future?
>>
>
On Mon, 17 May 2010, Chet Ramey wrote:
On 4/15/10 11:56 PM, DennisW wrote:
Mapfile would be that much more powerful if the callback function had
access to the current line. Is there any chance this might be added in
the future?
Sure, there's a chance. What would be the most useful form? A s
On 4/15/10 11:56 PM, DennisW wrote:
> Mapfile would be that much more powerful if the callback function had
> access to the current line. Is there any chance this might be added in
> the future?
Sure, there's a chance. What would be the most useful form? A shell
variable that lives for the durat
DennisW wrote:
> Mapfile would be that much more powerful if the callback function had
> access to the current line. Is there any chance this might be added in
> the future?
Can't answer directly on this, but it looks like the gateway between this
group and the mailing list hasn't worked for a l
