On 6/6/13 5:29 AM, Lionel Cons wrote:
> Forwarding an interesting posting from Roland Mainz who did an
> investigation why signal trap processing in ksh93, bash and dash is
> currently not reliable.
As I said in a previous message, I have done considerable work between
bash-4.2 and bash-4.3 to mov
On 6/6/13 5:31 AM, Lionel Cons wrote:
> On 6 June 2013 11:29, Lionel Cons wrote:
>> Forwarding an interesting posting from Roland Mainz who did an
>> investigation why signal trap processing in ksh93, bash and dash is
>> currently not reliable.
>>
>> Lionel
>>
>
> PS: malloc() from AT&T libast, u
On 6 June 2013 11:29, Lionel Cons wrote:
> Forwarding an interesting posting from Roland Mainz who did an
> investigation why signal trap processing in ksh93, bash and dash is
> currently not reliable.
>
> Lionel
>
PS: malloc() from AT&T libast, used by ksh93, is async signal safe.
Unless bash's
