On 1/16/12 3:54 PM, Sung Pae wrote:
> The only issue then is that completing a bare `<`, `>` and `>>` results
> in the default completion command receiving the redirection operator as
> its first argument. The manual, however, states (my emphasis):
>
> For instance, assuming that there is a l
On 16 Jan 2012, at 11:29 AM, Chet Ramey wrote:
> I think you've uncovered a potential problem, but not the one you
> think. The important thing is that `>' is not a command separator and
> cannot be a command name. As such, it kind of slips between the cracks
> of the completion system.
> > Of co
On 1/11/12 3:31 AM, Sung Pae wrote:
> Hello,
>
> There is a small bug in the default completion system due to a
> disagreement between a few functions in what is considered a command
> delimiter. I have tested this on the current devel HEAD in the git repo
> (d00a2d6).
I think you've uncovered a
