On Sat, Feb 8, 2025, at 8:57 PM, Ángel wrote:
> I expect you to take this issue seriously and take the needed measures
> to ensure their wrong ways are fixed.
Alas, OP announced off-list that they have unsubscribed. If you
were to send your guidance to them directly, I'm sure they would
show you
On 2025-02-03 at 19:00 -0500, Zeffie wrote:
> I wanted to bring to your attention that the bash-bug mailing list
> messages are being marked as spam by our spam filtering. The debug
> headers indicate an "Invalid DKIM signature" which appears to be
> causing the posts to be flagged.
As you hav
Steffen Nurpmeso wrote in
<20250204231325.B4BPBm8Q@steffen%sdaoden.eu>:
|Robert Elz wrote in
| <6584.1738633...@jacaranda.noi.kre.to>:
||Date:Mon, 03 Feb 2025 19:00:28 -0500
||From:Zeffie via Bug reports for the GNU Bourne Again SHell \
||
||Message-ID: <875b
Robert Elz wrote in
<6584.1738633...@jacaranda.noi.kre.to>:
|Date:Mon, 03 Feb 2025 19:00:28 -0500
|From:Zeffie via Bug reports for the GNU Bourne Again SHell \
|
|Message-ID: <875b2e87e5d847a4aa04ba2b31bec...@zeffie.com>
...
|| The debug headers indicate an "
dude u cant whitelist it or smth .. ?
On Tue, Feb 4, 2025, 3:00 AM Zeffie via Bug reports for the GNU Bourne
Again SHell wrote:
> Thank you for your thoughts. While I appreciate your perspective on DKIM
> and spam filtering, I expect the list maintainers to handle these issues
> properly. I've b
Thank you for your thoughts. While I appreciate your perspective on DKIM
and spam filtering, I expect the list maintainers to handle these issues
properly. I've been running mail servers since the 1990s, so I
understand the complexities involved. Even if many messages on the list
aren’t signed
Date:Mon, 03 Feb 2025 19:00:28 -0500
From:Zeffie via Bug reports for the GNU Bourne Again SHell
Message-ID: <875b2e87e5d847a4aa04ba2b31bec...@zeffie.com>
| To whom it may concern,
That is most probably not anyone on this list - you'd need to contact
the list maint
