On 2021-10-29 at 22:41 -0700, L A Walsh wrote:
> > This is quite unfair.
> Huh? It's true--look at how functions have to be stored in
> the environment because someone was able to hack "their
> own system" where they already have unrestricted shell access.
>
> If that isn't ugly or lame, what i
Le 30/10/2021 à 07:41, L A Walsh écrivait :
On 2021/10/29 12:33, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 11:59:02AM -0700, L A Walsh wrote:
How much lameness Chet has introduced into bash to accommodate
the wrong users.
This is quite unfair.
Huh? It's true--look at how functions hav
On 2021/10/29 12:33, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 11:59:02AM -0700, L A Walsh wrote:
How much lameness Chet has introduced into bash to accommodate
the wrong users.
This is quite unfair.
Huh? It's true--look at how functions have to be stored in
the environment b
Date:Fri, 29 Oct 2021 11:59:02 -0700
From:L A Walsh
Message-ID: <617c4476.2010...@tlinx.org>
| Bash is a command_line console language designed to execute commands
| locally in the context of the user. Local user access to a console,
| from a security standpo
on 29/10/2021 at 21:33, Greg Wooledge wrote :
Making bash *less horrible* to use for programming purposes doesn't
qualify as "lameness" in my book. Even if it does "enable" people to
use shells for unsuited purposes, I'd still much rather have indexed
and associative arrays (bash) than not have
On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 11:59:02AM -0700, L A Walsh wrote:
> How much lameness Chett has introduced into bash to accommodate
> the wrong users.
This is quite unfair. The major systemic problems with bash (and sh)
weren't introduced by Chet Ramey. They've been baked in from the very
beginning.
M
On 2021/10/29 05:01, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 12:48:57PM +0300, Ilkka Virta wrote:
Not that I'm sure the upper one is still safe against every input. I think
issues with associative array keys have been
discussed on the list before.
Sadly, yes. Bash is the explo
