> This is from https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/2023-06/msg00092.htm
> l
>
> It ensures e.g. that control characters are always displayed in a
> printable manner.
so that is definitely intentional and everything is now clear to me
thanks a lot for your time
ciao
-gabriele
On 4/24/24 11:34 AM, baldu...@units.it wrote:
Note the difference in how the argument to the function is
output. In the case of bash-5.3-alpha the syntax of the argument is
correct (ie if I call the show function with $'\n1\n2\n3\n' everything
works as expected), but is less readable (and this
On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 11:35 AM wrote:
>
> hello
>
> Apologies if I am missing some blatant point here
>
> I have noticed a difference in behavior of bash-5.2.26 and
> bash-5.3-alpha which isn't a problem of correctness, but may be wasn't
> intentional(?)
This is from https://lists.gnu.org/archi
On Wed, 24 Apr 2024, at 4:34 PM, baldu...@units.it wrote:
> hello
>
> Apologies if I am missing some blatant point here
>
> I have noticed a difference in behavior of bash-5.2.26 and
> bash-5.3-alpha which isn't a problem of correctness, but may be wasn't
> intentional(?)
>
> Given the scriptlett:
