Re: [bash-bug] A note for read builtin

2010-06-25 Thread Dr. Werner Fink
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 01:18:25PM -0400, Chet Ramey wrote: > On 6/23/10 6:08 AM, Dr. Werner Fink wrote: > > > Yet an other version of the patch to avoid trouble with the > > coproc builtin tested out in tests/coproc.tests. There is one > > difference more with tests/redir.tests at > > Thanks, t

Re: [bash-bug] A note for read builtin

2010-06-24 Thread Chet Ramey
On 6/23/10 6:08 AM, Dr. Werner Fink wrote: > Yet an other version of the patch to avoid trouble with the > coproc builtin tested out in tests/coproc.tests. There is one > difference more with tests/redir.tests at Thanks, this is a great start. There's still more work to be done with bookkeeping

Re: [bash-bug] A note for read builtin

2010-06-24 Thread Dr. Werner Fink
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 12:08:20PM +0200, Werner Fink wrote: > > Yet an other version of the patch to avoid trouble with the > coproc builtin tested out in tests/coproc.tests. There is one > difference more with tests/redir.tests at > > exit 3 | $EXIT > $TMPDIR/null-redir-e > echo $? -- ${pi

Re: [bash-bug] A note for read builtin

2010-06-23 Thread Dr. Werner Fink
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 10:00:12AM +0200, Werner Fink wrote: > On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 04:50:54PM -0400, Chet Ramey wrote: > > On 6/18/10 10:05 AM, Dr. Werner Fink wrote: > > > > > as now is visible the last command in the pipe sequence done > > > in the bash is a real sub process whereas in the k