On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 01:18:25PM -0400, Chet Ramey wrote:
> On 6/23/10 6:08 AM, Dr. Werner Fink wrote:
>
> > Yet an other version of the patch to avoid trouble with the
> > coproc builtin tested out in tests/coproc.tests. There is one
> > difference more with tests/redir.tests at
>
> Thanks, t
On 6/23/10 6:08 AM, Dr. Werner Fink wrote:
> Yet an other version of the patch to avoid trouble with the
> coproc builtin tested out in tests/coproc.tests. There is one
> difference more with tests/redir.tests at
Thanks, this is a great start. There's still more work to be done with
bookkeeping
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 12:08:20PM +0200, Werner Fink wrote:
>
> Yet an other version of the patch to avoid trouble with the
> coproc builtin tested out in tests/coproc.tests. There is one
> difference more with tests/redir.tests at
>
> exit 3 | $EXIT > $TMPDIR/null-redir-e
> echo $? -- ${pi
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 10:00:12AM +0200, Werner Fink wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 04:50:54PM -0400, Chet Ramey wrote:
> > On 6/18/10 10:05 AM, Dr. Werner Fink wrote:
> >
> > > as now is visible the last command in the pipe sequence done
> > > in the bash is a real sub process whereas in the k