Re: 'help set' missing '--'

Dennis Williamson wrote: I think this distinction from the man page is what's missing in the help: > [...] Exactly. Thanks for pointing it out, I thought it was clear :) -- Be conservative in what you do, be liberal in what you accept from others. - jbp, master of the net, in RFC793

Re: 'help set' missing '--'

Greg Wooledge wrote: Or: set [-abefhkmnptuvxBCHP] [-o option-name] [--] [arg ...] More: set [-abefhkmnptuvxBCHP] [-o option-name] [-] [--] [arg ...] Plus: Describe '--' the same way '-' is described (with an extra part in the full help message below the synopsis). -- Be conservative i

Re: 'help set' missing '--'

> >>SYNOPSIS > >> set [--abefhkmnptuvxBCHP] [-o option-name] [arg ...] On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 09:16:02AM -0500, Chris F.A. Johnson wrote: > On Mon, 10 Jan 2011, Christopher Roy Bratusek wrote: > >Hmm, one could read it as "--" "--a" "--b" and so on, maybe it could be > >improved. > >Agre

Re: 'help set' missing '--'

On Mon, 10 Jan 2011, Christopher Roy Bratusek wrote: On Monday 10 January 2011 09:06:42 Chris F.A. Johnson wrote: On Mon, 10 Jan 2011, Jan Schampera wrote: the help output for the set builtin command misses '--'. It's there: SYNOPSIS set [--abefhkmnptuvxBCHP] [-o option-name] [arg

Re: 'help set' missing '--'

On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 2:06 AM, Chris F.A. Johnson wrote: > On Mon, 10 Jan 2011, Jan Schampera wrote: > > the help output for the set builtin command misses '--'. >> > > It's there: > > SYNOPSIS >set [--abefhkmnptuvxBCHP] [-o option-name] [arg ...] > > -- > Chris F.A. Johnson,

Re: 'help set' missing '--'

On Mon, 10 Jan 2011, Jan Schampera wrote: the help output for the set builtin command misses '--'. It's there: SYNOPSIS set [--abefhkmnptuvxBCHP] [-o option-name] [arg ...] -- Chris F.A. Johnson, Author: Pro Bash Programming: Scripting the GNU/Linux Sh