>Eric Blake wrote:
>>Joachim Schmitz writes:
>> Or did something break in forwarding mails to bug-bash to the news group?
>
>Probably during the mail server move, gnu.emacs.help broke as well.
Is there something being done to get it fixed?
Bye, Jojo
"Joachim Schmitz" writes:
> Or did something break in forwarding mails to bug-bash to the news group?
Probably during the mail server move, gnu.emacs.help broke as well.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
Eric Blake writes:
> Along with an accidental announcement for a missing patch 11:
>
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/2011-05/msg00028.html
It's not missing, that's a 4.1 patch.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3
On 13/05/11 21:44, Eric Blake wrote:
On 05/13/2011 04:54 AM, Joachim Schmitz wrote:
Hi folks
Just found Bash-4.2 patches 9 and 10, strange that they never got
announced?
Yes they did:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/2011-05/msg00014.html
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/
Eric Blake wrote:
>On 05/13/2011 04:54 AM, Joachim Schmitz wrote:
>> Hi folks
>>
>> Just found Bash-4.2 patches 9 and 10, strange that they never got
>> announced?
>
>Yes they did:
>
>http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/2011-05/msg00014.html
>http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/2011
On 05/13/2011 04:54 AM, Joachim Schmitz wrote:
> Hi folks
>
> Just found Bash-4.2 patches 9 and 10, strange that they never got
> announced?
Yes they did:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/2011-05/msg00014.html
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/2011-05/msg00015.html
Along with
