Re: Performance issue of find function in Gluster File System

2017-08-17 Thread Chet Ramey
On 8/16/17 4:02 PM, Zhao Li wrote: > Hi, > > I found there is a big difference of time performance between "ls" function > and "find" function in Gluster File System > . > Here is the minimal working example.

Re: Performance issue of find function in Gluster File System

2017-08-16 Thread Pierre Gaston
On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 11:02 PM, Zhao Li wrote: > Hi, > > I found there is a big difference of time performance between "ls" function > and "find" function in Gluster File System > ide/GlusterFS%20Introduction/>. > Here is the minima

Re: Performance issue of find function in Gluster File System

2017-08-16 Thread L A Walsh
Zhao Li wrote: So I am wondering what C code you use for "ls" and "find" and how you explain "*" in "ls" and "find" to lead to this big difference in Gluster File System. --- Nothing to do with Gluster, bash, ls or find, but w/the example. I did both w/output to files in ./tmp -- you need

Performance issue of find function in Gluster File System

2017-08-16 Thread Zhao Li
Hi, I found there is a big difference of time performance between "ls" function and "find" function in Gluster File System . Here is the minimal working example. mkdir tmp touch tmp/{000..300}.txt time find