Re: Negative or zero arguments to yank-last-arg in bound keystrokes

2010-12-06 Thread Dennis Williamson
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 7:29 PM, Chet Ramey wrote: > On 12/6/10 8:22 PM, Chet Ramey wrote: > >> Yes.  In this case, the documentation is less than clear.  The count >> argument is actually set by the first call to yank-last-arg, and that >> argument sets the word to extract from the history entry.

Re: Negative or zero arguments to yank-last-arg in bound keystrokes

2010-12-06 Thread Chet Ramey
On 12/6/10 8:22 PM, Chet Ramey wrote: > Yes. In this case, the documentation is less than clear. The count > argument is actually set by the first call to yank-last-arg, and that > argument sets the word to extract from the history entry. Subsequent > calls to yank-last-arg without a different

Re: Negative or zero arguments to yank-last-arg in bound keystrokes

2010-12-06 Thread Chet Ramey
On 11/8/10 6:26 PM, Dennis Williamson wrote: > Bash Version: 4.1 > Patch Level: 9 > Release Status: release > > Description: > > Negative or zero arguments to yank-last-arg in bound keystrokes do not perform > as expected when the keystroke is pressed repeatedly. > &

Negative or zero arguments to yank-last-arg in bound keystrokes

2010-11-08 Thread Dennis Williamson
Patch Level: 9 Release Status: release Description: Negative or zero arguments to yank-last-arg in bound keystrokes do not perform as expected when the keystroke is pressed repeatedly. Comparing to yank-last-arg with no arguments or positive arguments which step backwards successively th