Chet Ramey wrote:
> I wrote the entire test suite except for the one file from Glen Fowler.
> It is (or should be) copyright GPL3 just like the rest of the distribution.
Just wanted to say thanks for the clear and quick responses. They helped.
Jonathan
On 7/16/11 4:21 PM, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Chet Ramey wrote:
>
>> The man page copyright belongs to me -- I don't know that I ever
>> assigned it to the FSF. I don't have a problem with others modifying the
>> man page, and expect it under certain circumstances. For instance, if a
>> distribut
Chet Ramey wrote:
> The man page copyright belongs to me -- I don't know that I ever
> assigned it to the FSF. I don't have a problem with others modifying the
> man page, and expect it under certain circumstances. For instance, if a
> distribution modifies the startup files bash reads (e.g., to
On 7/15/11 8:49 PM, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Hi Chet et al,
>
> Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>
> [concerning licensing]
>> Looking over bash 4.2, I have a few questions:
>
> After investigating a little more and testing with files removed, I'm
> down to one question (though it would still be nice to c
Hi Chet et al,
Jonathan Nieder wrote:
[concerning licensing]
> Looking over bash 4.2, I have a few questions:
After investigating a little more and testing with files removed, I'm
down to one question (though it would still be nice to clarify the
licenses of the other files mentioned): what is t
Hi,
Adrian Bunk wrote:
> /usr/share/doc/bash/copyright says:
[...]
> the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free
> Software Foundation; either version 2, or (at your option) any later
[...]
> The source files say:
[...]
>it under the terms of the GNU General Public Li
