On 3/10/11 5:03 PM, Philip Prindeville wrote:
> On 3/10/11 12:50 PM, Micah Cowan wrote:
>> (03/10/2011 12:28 PM), Micah Cowan wrote:
>>> (03/10/2011 11:53 AM), Micah Cowan wrote:
(03/10/2011 11:42 AM), Philip Prindeville wrote:
> My request is simple. Using termcap/ncurses info (which you
(03/10/2011 02:03 PM), Philip Prindeville wrote:
> A lot of programs don't behave properly (or perhaps, "don't behave the
> same") when they detect that stdout isn't a terminal. But I think
> someone else mentioned this already.
Yeah. You could always run the program under another program that fo
On 3/10/11 12:50 PM, Micah Cowan wrote:
(03/10/2011 12:28 PM), Micah Cowan wrote:
(03/10/2011 11:53 AM), Micah Cowan wrote:
(03/10/2011 11:42 AM), Philip Prindeville wrote:
My request is simple. Using termcap/ncurses info (which you need anyway
for the readline stuff), it would be nice to hav
(03/10/2011 12:28 PM), Micah Cowan wrote:
> (03/10/2011 11:53 AM), Micah Cowan wrote:
>> (03/10/2011 11:42 AM), Philip Prindeville wrote:
>>> My request is simple. Using termcap/ncurses info (which you need anyway
>>> for the readline stuff), it would be nice to have the option of running
>>> comm
(03/10/2011 11:53 AM), Micah Cowan wrote:
> (03/10/2011 11:42 AM), Philip Prindeville wrote:
>> My request is simple. Using termcap/ncurses info (which you need anyway
>> for the readline stuff), it would be nice to have the option of running
>> commands in a pseudo-tty and then bracketing the out
