> I believe it would be interesting to measure the combinatorial coverage of
> the fuzz tests.
You already asked this... why didn't you follow up in the thread that
you started?
> [...] So we would be able to say what percentage of 2-way,
> 3-way, etc. combinations are covered, which would be use
Inasmuch as, there apparently is now a fuzz test script(courtesy of Michal
Zalewski, <
http://lcamtuf.blogspot.ie/2014/10/bash-bug-how-we-finally-cracked.html >
that identifies the bash bug...
I believe it would be interesting to measure the combinatorial coverage of
the fuzz tests. So we would
